|
Thursday,
December 22, 2011
 Post-Thanksgiving
Workout - A
couple of days after Thanksgiving, I did a day hike in the Grand
Canyon with hiking buddies John Eastwood and Bill Ferris. [The
photo to the right shows John and Bill hiking over the Tonto trail as
it leads to Indian Garden. Click to see a larger image.] I
decided to ask the editor of the Daily Sun if he'd be interested in a
story for his weekly Outdoors column, which runs each Tuesday.
He was enthusiastic and I penned something quite quickly. He
said it would run the next week (so, a bit less than two weeks after
Turkey Day). But, we got a big snowstorm that weekend and he
couldn't resist writing up some cross-country skiing story. And,
I got bumped the next week as well. Finally, the
story ran on Tuesday, December 20. Here is my version, which
is slightly different than the one he ran, but with his title:
|
Walking
off the holiday meal
Dennis Foster
It
is a couple of days after Thanksgiving and time to do some
serious work to counteract the effects of all that turkey,
stuffing, cranberry sauce, and, yes, the pumpkin pie.
Living in Flagstaff, there is no better way to do that than to
take a day hike in the Grand Canyon. Especially when the
weather is terrific – clear blue skies and balmy inner
canyon temperatures.
So, along
with two hiking buddies, we headed out of town at 7 a.m.
Our plan was to hike down the South Kaibab trail to the Tonto
trail, then over to Indian Garden and hike back up to the rim
on the Bright Angel trail. The total distance is about
13.5 miles and each trail segment – South Kaibab, Tonto and
Bright Angel – is about 4.5 miles.
The
temperature was right about freezing when we started down the
trail at nine o’clock. We were in the shade and it
stayed cold until we reached Cedar Ridge 1.5 miles down the
trail. The trail was busy with hikers but not crowded
like at other times of the year.
As we
continued down we got to see some of the work that has been
done on this trail over the last couple of years. The
improvement on the section through the Redwall is especially
noticeable, as the rocky stretches have now been replaced by
well formed steps.
At eleven
o’clock we reached the junction with the Tonto trail.
We headed west and began to contour our way through Pipe Creek
canyon. This trail gets a lot less use and is in a much
more primitive state. Not surprisingly, over the next
three hours, until we reached Indian Garden, we only saw two
other groups of hikers.
Pipe Creek
is perennial which makes it a great attraction at any time of
the year. We pulled in here a little after noon and ate
our lunch. The low lying winter sun quickly set behind
the South Rim above us, encouraging us to move on. From
here we hiked in the shade of the towering façade of the
South Rim nearly all the way to the Bright Angel trail.
Just
before reaching Indian Garden, the trail passes by the site
where Ralph Cameron once had some tent cabins for rent.
I brought along a copy of a photo of these tents that was
published in National Geographic in 1914. We found the
little terrace where these tents once stood, along with a few
pieces of metal.
At Indian
Garden there was construction going on at the restrooms along
the trail and the day use area was closed. So, we rested
in the campground area, snacking and filling up our water
containers. During the winter, the water faucets along
the trail above Indian Garden are turned off, so you need to
have all you’ll need when you leave here.
We started
out of Indian Garden at 2:30 p.m. and within fifteen minutes
were back into the shade, permanently. As we climbed up
the trail, it got colder and colder. By the time I
reached the rock with the ancient pictographs, about two miles
from the rim, I was back to wearing my fleece jacket and a
headband around my ears.
I was the
last of the group to reach the rim, topping out at just before
5:30 p.m., as the setting sun was casting a dim light that had
turned the very top of the north rim purple, signaling the end
of a perfect hiking day in the Grand Canyon. Perhaps a
reward is in order. I wonder if there is still pumpkin
pie at home?
Dennis
Foster lives in Flagstaff and has been an avid hiker in Grand
Canyon since 1977.
For
More Information:
Bright
Angel, Tonto and Hermit Trails: For information on
these, and other inner canyon trails, there are many trail
guides available. Among the most readily available is Scott
Thybony's "Official Guide to Hiking Grand Canyon."
You can find this at area bookstores, or online, at the Grand
Canyon Association website.
Backcountry Permits: Find information on permits and
trip planning at http://www.nps.gov/grca/index.htm
Grand
Canyon: To learn more about visiting the Grand Canyon go
to www.nps.gov/grca.
Or, you can find information at www.grandcanyonscout.com
| Click
on any picture (except granary closeup) to see a larger
image. |

I knew this was wrong! |

On the improved
Redwall stretch. |

Group photo
at Pipe Creek.
|
John silhouetted
against Isis Temple. |

Zoroaster
looms over Pipe Creek ... |

... and the small granary within!
|
|
The paper ran two
photos - the group shot and the view of Indian Garden that appear
above. I have added a few others of interest. Some notes:
The
thermometer at Cedar Ridge. The
photo shows that the "reading" was some 58 degrees.
Funny, since that is higher than the forecast high on the rim.
And, it was still early in the morning (9:30 am) and everyone was
bundled up. I'd say it was in the mid to upper 30s, making this
25 degrees too high. I have often noticed this during the
summer, when it will read 90 degrees plus, or even one hundred, when
it is clearly not that hot. So, this must be part of the Park
Service's deception plan to discourage hiking in the canyon!
Seems like the Department
of Justice has been trying to emulate them!
The
granary in Pipe Creek. The
photos above show the view looking back across Pipe Creek, with
Zoroaster (and Brahma) in the background. Quite impressive,
especially when you note that there is a tiny granary tucked away
under a ledge at the base of the Tapeats. The close up version
is a bit fuzzy, but you can see the dark hole in the middle where the
opening is. In the thumbnail of the bigger picture you can kind
of tell where it is, but if you click on it and get the full image,
you should be able to see the opening better. I have hiked by
this before, but it was back in the 1980s. I'll have to look up
those old photos some day!
Editor's
literary license. In
the published story, the editor inserted, "after taking the
shuttle bus to the trailhead," after my comment about starting
down the trail at 9 a.m. That wasn't true, but I can see his
interest in describing to the general public how to access the
trailhead. What really happened is that we parked at the nearby
picnic area and walked to the trailhead. That worked out for us
as John's wife, Kathy, came along but didn't want to do the whole
hike. She only went down to the top of the Redwall (which is
still 4-5 miles round trip) and then drove over to the Bright Angel
lodge, where she picked us up. Sweet deal for us, otherwise we'd
have had to budget in another hour, or so, for transit. Ugh!
More editorial
additions. In
the paper version, there are some additional comments from the editor
on the icy conditions of the upper couple of miles on these
trails. [Funny, that didn't make it into the web version, nor
did my "For More Information" section. Hmm.]
That was a key attraction to us - absolutely no snow or ice on these
trails for our hike even though it was right after Thanksgiving.
We did have some snow fall weeks earlier, but it was all gone for our
hike. I did, however, bring along my Kahtoola
micro spikes just in case!
The
Cameron tent cabins. I
mentioned these in my story on the backpacking trip from Indian Garden
to Hermit published almost exactly a year ago (Back
in the saddle). But, I didn't have room for photos.
So, when we neared the Bright Angel trail, we matched up the old photo
I had copied out of the National Geographic Magazine from 1914 (that
the Kolbs had taken which was part of their long story in this issue) and scouted out the
site...
1/2012 update: The photo I
used from this hike didn't really match up perfectly with the old Kolb
photo. So, on a later trip (BA
Wash ruins) I spent some time trying to better line up the
view. That is shown above, where I have indicated corresponding
physical features with the arrows (blue for the rim and yellow for the
big rocks). The short salmon arrows show where the Plateau Point
Trail is today versus back in the early 1900s. I've used the
other salmon arrows to show where Cameron's tent cabins would be
today, as well as where the Kolb's photo studio was located. I
have scouted around for any sign of the Kolb residence, but haven't
found anything. You can see another structure in the new photo,
which I believe is part of the old power plant. It could be that
the Kolb residence was completely removed with any usable material
going into the power plant buildings. [Click on the photo above
to see a bigger image.]
Another obvious change is that there are now lots of big trees in the
Garden Creek drainage. It used to be that this are flooded
rather often, which is why Cameron's facility was well up above the
bed. Indeed, if you wander around the campground area here you
will notice a number of retaining walls whose purpose is to divert
water away from this area.
I
imagine that Indian Garden was a pretty hot place back in the
day! In fact, the tent cabin site now lies alongside the Tonto
trail. It used to be part of the old Bright Angel trail, which
went east out of Indian Garden and then followed a ravine down into
Pipe Creek. Along this old trail there are a few old Indian
ruins that I keep meaning to visit.
|
|
Friday,
December 23, 2011
On
Storage - As
I gaze over my rather extensive collection of DVDs, I keep thinking
about the future of storage. I know, it doesn't seem very
interesting, but it is to me. [So is how aluminum is made,
but that will have to wait for a later time.] I can remember the
days before we could tape TV shows and there was no such thing as a
movie rental business. I can still remember wanting to watch a
new show that was called "Star Truck." But, I missed
seeing it because it was either on too late or it didn't command a
sufficient vote to allow watching on our small black and white
TV. It was only years later, when I saw reruns of this show,
that I realized it's title was "Star Trek"! But, with
just four channels (plus or minus), shows appearing as reruns wasn't
all that common. So, if you missed something, you just missed
it. Then, along came video tape.
I missed the Betamax
wave, thank goodness. [I also pretty much missed 8-track tapes,
too.] But, eventually a VHS player/recorder was cheap enough to
buy, as was the tape. Now, you could actually tape shows, and
buy (or, rent) copies of movies. And, thus began my video
collection. I taped mostly movies and mostly I never watched
them! Well, in economics we talk about something called a
"reservation price," which is what you'd pay just on the off
chance you might want to "consume" some good. So it
was with these movies. I didn't do much insofar as TV shows goes
except for the Babylon
5 series. I taped the original airing (at the slowest speed;
6 episodes to a tape!), and then I taped the reruns on TNT when they
picked up the fifth season. Then I taped them all again when the
shows went to the Sci Fi channel and
they were aired in letterbox. Now, I did watch the whole series
a couple of times, but not the Sci Fi version. Of course now I
own the DVDs (and have watched them all the way through at least
twice).
The advent of the Laserdisc
interested me a lot, but was way too expensive for my tastes. I
can remember another student in grad school musing about being able to
buy a multi-disc set of Lawrence
of Arabia. I am pretty sure that was before the restored
movie was re-released to theaters in 1989 (which I saw twice within a
week). And, during a film festival on campus one year that
featured movies by Orson Welles, I caught a session with Roger
Ebert who was using a Laserdisc to go through Citizen
Kane practically frame by frame. Too cool, but still too
pricey.
So, I was quite enthusiastic about the DVD revolution and started to
build quite a library of movies. When blu-ray came along (I
decided to give HD DVD a pass) I was leery of replacing my DVDs.
So far I haven't really done that, with a few exceptions. The
blu-ray player does a good job on DVDs - in fact, if you couldn't play
a DVD on the blu-ray I am sure I would not have moved that way.
Now, I pretty much only buy blu-ray discs to add to my DVD
collection. [If you click on the picture of my videos, above,
you'll see a larger image and can see my copy of the Lost
series on blu-ray next to my DVD copy of Repo
Man.]
But, I wonder why. It seems to me (and, probably everyone else),
that the whole "on-demand" market is just going to get
better and better. Why not just pay $1 every time you want to
see your favorite movie rather than pay $20 to own a copy. I do
like the extra features on the discs, and the on-demand services will
have to find a way to include that if I am going to switch sooner
rather than later. Still, it makes me think that my lifelong
quest to obtain these movies has been for naught. As it is, I
already get sucked into watching a movie on my satellite service even
though I own a copy! Just last night - an hour of Battle:
Los Angeles. I suspect the current generation doesn't feel
as compelled
to acquire and store movies, books, and music. My book
collection is also too large, although I am loathe to give up any of
my really old Grand Canyon tomes. And, while my music collection
isn't that large, there was a time when I had lots of vinyl, and even
45s before that. Now, you just skip out to iTunes
or Google Books and find
everything you could want. Maybe in another 20 years, you won't
find home libraries, or video and music collections. Everyone
will just have electronic access and our days of personal storage will
be over. Sort of like in Fahrenheit
451, but in a nice way. Insert smiley face here.
|
|
Tuesday,
December 27, 2011
Why
Do We Read? - I
was having an interesting conversation with someone about how we just
don't remember the things we read. Especially, the books, et
al., that we read for pleasure. I can often say whether a book
was good or not, but can't ever recall any specifics to back up those
opinions. So, what was the point? Good question.
Yet, I have always liked to read and still do so. I have lots of
books, and plenty of them I will never read despite my best
intentions. Very few have I read more than once. The short
stories of Philip
K. Dick come to mind, and I have read parts of the Lord
of the Rings more than once (but, I've seen the 3 movies more than
that!). But, those are exceptions to the general rule.
However, I
have a hard time giving them up. I always look at them and think
that I might read them again. But, why? Well, because I
don't remember any of the details. And, therein lies the dilemma
I am wrestling with - why do we read?
Years ago I read John Kenneth Galbraith's autobiography, A
Life in Our Times, which I really liked. But, why?
Well, I remember it as being well-written (which is true of his books
anyway) and full of details about being raised in Canada and ending up
at Harvard and working for the price control agency during WWII, as
well as doing a study of the value of our strategic bombing during
WWII (or, was that in another book?) and working for the Kennedy
administration. But, I clearly don't recall any but the barest
of details - the kind you could write out in a paragraph not unlike
the one you are reading! I do remember one specific comment of
his that has stuck with me for years (yes, I read it a long time
ago). Once he finished writing a book he would sit down and
write up a page, or two, of comments and notes about it so that he
wouldn't forget what he had read! To this day, I do the same
with nonfiction books. In fact, I can't read something of
substance without a pen and pencil, pad of paper and sticky notes at
the ready. Consequently, it takes me a long time to read these
books, but I have notes to refer to so that I can recall what I
learned.
For books I use in my teaching that is not the case. Forgetting
what I read, that is. I read them over and over, if not in their
entirety, then at least major sections/chapters. I take
voluminous notes and often have put together PowerPoint slide shows to
draw out the details for my students. Of course, what my
students do is read them once and don't take notes and forget what
they've read pretty much as soon as they put the book down. But,
that's not really their fault, is it? And, clearly, our
educational establishment would never think to require the level of
effort necessary to insure that students actually understood what they
have read. But, that is the topic for another blog.
As I noted in my previous blog (On
Storage), I have a lot of DVDs. And, I watch them.
Frequently and repetitively in some cases. And, I am sure that I
remember more from a movie (even one I have only seen once) then I
have from the most recent novel I have read. And, that got me to
thinking about whether we could have a world without a written
language, or perhaps only one we use infrequently.
For example, the signs on the highway almost always have a picture of
an airplane when the airport exit is coming up. I suppose we
could say that signs posting numbers don't count anyway (speed limits,
highway numbers, etc.). But, in the far off future, we may be
doing everything by voice anyway . . .
|
Ed stepped
into his car, a new 2075 Phantom. It started up and Ed
detailed his itinerary for the day. "First stop is
at Barton's, my lawyer. Then, I want to go to the
archives at the USGS. After that, lunch at Maroney's."
The afternoon itinerary didn't matter. The computer
voice in the car acknowledged Ed's destinations and asked if
he had any special requirements for the trip other than speed,
which he answered, "No."
As the car
entered the street, Ed flipped through some news channels on
the state-of-the-art entertainment system he had specially
installed. After a few moments he decided to order up a
refined news summary. "Give me a five minute
summary of current financial news that affects the North
American Union going back 24 hours." He leaned back
and listened to the report. At the end, he said,
"Two more minutes on the current unemployment rate data
and implications. Add to that one minute on how the
Democrats and Republicans are likely to interpret this
situation." And, so it went as he traveled to his
lawyer's office to leave a DNA scan on a recording of his
updated will. Since lawyers had to now require all
parties to a dispute or contract to view the contents spoken
to them, a lot of the "party of the first part" rigamarole
was eliminated and - no surprise - people actually understood
what they were agreeing to.
|
Well, that illustrates the idea. It just seems to me that
written content will become increasingly obsolete. Funny thing
for me to claim, since I like to write! So, from books-on-tape,
to pictures on the McDonald's cash register, I can easily imagine that
the written word will get scarcer and scarcer. When we can just
verbalize our requests for information and get it back in a spoken, or
visual, manner, what will be left to write? And, will we still
read?
|
|
Tuesday,
December 27, 2011
Advice
for Ron Paul
- The Iowa caucuses are just a few days away. Earlier for
this election year than in years past. In fact, I participated
in the caucuses in 1976, when I was in my senior year at Drake
University. Great fun, but clearly they were held while school
was in session. Anyway, the expectation is that Ron Paul will
win, or finish a close
second. He has spent a great deal of time, energy and effort in
this state. The question is, what will he do with his showing to
ratchet up to the next level. Most pundits keep saying that he
is maxed out at about 20% approval among voters and if he doesn't
change his style, I would agree.
But, unlike most pundits, I like Ron Paul. It takes a while and
you really have to listen to his message carefully, but if you do, you
may find he is the most sensible candidate in the race. Yet, his
opponents have hijacked the narrative on him as a crazy person.
That is not only unfair, it is just laying the groundwork for what the
Dems would say should Paul win the nomination. But, I don't
think he can win the nomination, but can change his tack to further
his cause. To wit . . .
Demote foreign
policy as a campaign issue. The
hullabaloo mostly comes from Ron Paul's foreign policy. So, why
not just refuse to go down that road? Indeed, there is virtually
nothing in his Plan
to Restore America that deals with foreign policy.
Acknowledge that fundamental international relationships are not
likely to change under a Ron Paul term (or, two). Maybe
something like getting rid of half the military installations around
the world would be enough. If absolutely nothing changes in the
foreign policy arena, but enormous advance is made on the domestic
front, it wouldn't bother me. It's still much better than what
we're likely to get. Maybe even an acceptable foreign policy
wonk for VP would help in this regard - I saw a news bit on Condi
Rice that made me think this could be the right choice!
Focus on
specific domestic issues. The
next step should be a shortened explicit wish list for domestic
policies that are practicable in a first term. Once outlined, it
can become the point of discussion, argument and debate. List
the 2 specific cabinet offices to get rid of - Energy and Education
probably, although Commerce, Agriculture, Labor and Transportation are
also on my list. Tout the fact that you're leaving Homeland
Security in for now. When it comes to the Fed, the call for an
audit is a good start, but it probably best not to push the envelope
on his proposal to End
the Fed. Simplify his tax reduction proposals and get them
out front and center. Finally, he has a specific list of
regulations that should be eliminated. He should focus on his
plan for regulatory reform that will reduce the regulatory bias that
is present in government anyway.
Angle for the
Convention. The
GOP Convention is probably
the last stop on the Ron Paul train. I think that he should use
his voter support to leverage a prime time spot at the convention,
where he can lay out a modest agenda for President Romney to follow
after he beats Obama - End those departments, cut taxes, keep
federal spending to no more than X% of GDP, place a sunset on all
regulations, etc. This is the best way to insure that the agenda
doesn't die with the end of his campaign. Getting a Marco
Rubio on the ticket as veep may also insure that the cause has
some longevity.
|